Untitled

​It seems that every conversation I've overheard in the past two weeks has devolved into something like this.

Say it with me: Marriage is a word, not a religious act. If people want to stick to their guns about not allowing gays to be married, they should also outlaw statehouse marriages, Buddhist marriages, Hindu marriages, atheist marriages, agnostic marriages, Muslim marriages, and heaven forbid Mixed Marriages.

/rant

Also, last night I had a dream that took place entirely on my LJ page. People commented instead of talking. This may be a sign that I need some quality time away from this computer.



I will marry Michelle Pfieffer once she has a sex-change and converts to Islam
Link
 Leave a comment | 12 comments
Thu, Feb. 12th, 2004 10:43 pm (UTC)
campanai will marry the former Brooklyn Dodger owner Branch Rickie once he has a sex change and comes back from the dead.
Link
Thread - Reply
Thu, Feb. 12th, 2004 10:44 pm (UTC)
akamuu¿Does that mean CFG has to marry us both in order to achieve his dreams?
Link
Parent - Thread - Reply
Fri, Feb. 13th, 2004 12:03 am (UTC)
sans_sommetthe live journal dream's not so bad--
a week or so ago i had a dream that took place on a bookshelf where a winnie the pooh book was being exiled by a collection of classics.
Link
Thread - Reply
Fri, Feb. 13th, 2004 01:09 am (UTC)
kasheOMG, I've never dreamed about LJ, or a computer even. . .
I like to try and decipher what dreams mean though,
I think it means you moss seeing your friends in person. . .
Link
Thread - Reply
Fri, Feb. 13th, 2004 05:12 am (UTC)
asthecrowfliesi read this line:
...they should also outlaw statehouse marriages, Buddhist marriages...

but my head thought you said steakhouse marriages, & i knew it was gonna be a long day...

(& for the record, i have no idea what my position on steakhouse marriages is.)
Link
Thread - Reply
Fri, Feb. 13th, 2004 06:59 am (UTC)
dura_luxe: Re:Steakhouse marriage is sacred and should only occur between Al Roker and his breakfast.
Link
Parent - Thread - Reply
Fri, Feb. 13th, 2004 05:25 am (UTC)
mom_starI see the bOstOn thread was started by someone named "gutfucker". Well, I suppose he's just miffed because the SLC won't officially recognize marriage between a man and his longterm haggis.
Link
Thread - Reply
Mon, Feb. 16th, 2004 02:39 am (UTC)
seattlesque: http://www.livejournal.com/users/manfromnantucketAlso, last night I had a dream that took place entirely on my LJ page. People commented instead of talking. This may be a sign that I need some quality time away from this computer.

Look at it this way: if your visual processing system sped up and you were able to see faster than 30 frames per second, you'd watch TV and it would look like a flipbook. This is just a sign that your mind is going fast enough that you're starting to notice that all your life is actually LiveJournal communication. Most people just tend to overlook that fact. But now you know...oh well!!

I will marry myself once I establish a concurrent parallel protocol for running two of my brains in the same universe at the same time...and build an adequate translation system so that when I'm performing sexual favors for myself I'm fully unaware that I'm doing a guy.
Link
Thread - Reply
Mon, Feb. 16th, 2004 03:32 am (UTC)
akamuu: Re: http://www.livejournal.com/users/manfromnantucketI will marry myself once I establish a concurrent parallel protocol for running two of my brains in the same universe at the same time...and build an adequate translation system so that when I'm performing sexual favors for myself I'm fully unaware that I'm doing a guy.

Wow. I read a post recently about someone seeing himself having a threesome from all three perspectives, and being horrified that he had two cocks in his mouth. Even if both cocks were his own.
Link
Parent - Thread - Reply
Mon, Feb. 16th, 2004 04:16 am (UTC)
seattlesque: malkovich malkovichThe grand design can be unsettling until you just give up and decide to play ball. Otherwise you'll get caught up in all kinds of issues of awareness of how we are all one holistic machine exploring and ripping up its own guts...

http://www.catandgirl.com/view.cgi?44
Link
Parent - Thread - Reply
Tue, Feb. 17th, 2004 11:41 am (UTC)
beyond_pale: fyiMassachusetts only had civil marriages for it's first 70ish years. The commonwealth didn't empower priests to perform legal wedding ceremonies till the late 1690s. 

The Puritans thought clerical marriage was "unscriptural."
Link
Thread - Reply
Tue, Feb. 17th, 2004 11:41 am (UTC)
beyond_pale: fyiMassachusetts only had civil marriages for its first 70ish years. The commonwealth didn't empower priests to perform legal wedding ceremonies till the late 1690s. 

The Puritans thought clerical marriage was "unscriptural."